Search blog.co.uk

1701 Act of Settlement

by lizdavies @ 20 Apr. 2008 - 21:57:14

Apparently Vera Baird, the Solicitor General says the Government are finally looking to changing this Act, which is the one that insists on male primogeniture for inheriting the Monarchy.

About time too, I say. When women are supposed to be equal, and her present Majesty has done such a fine job for the last 50 years or so, what is the point in making girls step aside for a younger brother?

And of course by doing it now, before Prince William gets married and has children, is the ideal time. Prince Charles is the Queen's eldest child and he has only two boys to succeed him - so there is nobody whose nose might be put out of joint by the change.

They are also looking to change the rule that says anyone wanting to be in line of succession can't be, or marry, a Roman Catholic. Do it, and let's finally get on with disestablishment of the church and state while we're about it, which has been rumbling about since Victorian times. (Every schoolboy should know that the longest word in the English language is antidisestablishmentarianism!)


 
 

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

LissaTLissaT pro
21/04/08 @ 00:39

What about floccinoccinihilipilification? Or even pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?

I agree with you about the succession - women on the whole have been among our better monarchs.

My feeling is that the disestablishment of the Church of England is a much more complex matter than at first appears (not least because it can only be dissestablished by the monarch who would by the time s/he was asked to sign an act of disestablishement have sworn to uphold the established church at his/her coronation), and that as long as the monarch is its head s/he should be a practising member of the church and promise that his/her children will be similarly brought up. However, I can see no reason why members of the royal family shouldn't marry Roman Catholics without losing their place in the succession. Oddly they may marry people of other religions without any constitutional problems arising.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. Final Countdown
    by lizdavies on 15 Jul. 2008
  2. Captives
    by lizdavies on 14 Jul. 2008
  3. Five Go Out to Play
    by lizdavies on 12 Jul. 2008
  4. Still-hopping Sid
    by lizdavies on 09 Jul. 2008
  5. Couch potato
    by lizdavies on 06 Jul. 2008
  6. New Doors
    by lizdavies on 28 Jun. 2008
  7. Wedding Part 1
    by lizdavies on 28 Jun. 2008
  8. Hopalong Sid
    by lizdavies on 26 Jun. 2008
  9. Lost near Keston
    by lizdavies on 22 Jun. 2008
  10. Lazy Day
    by lizdavies on 13 Jun. 2008